What do you think?
My understanding is that some people might view the “sponsorship” of a child by someone in the West as yet another “colonial” kind of move on behalf of the “First World” interfering with the “Third World” (I know those terms are no longer politically correct).
But what if you’re just really helping someone in their situation?
Not all child sponsor organizations also come with the “strings attached” promise of making sure that that child also gets a good Christian education. Some organizations place their focus on education basics: math, science, english, etc.
So what’s your take?
Is this just another example of the West trying to interfere and dominate another culture? Or can’t it be done to real, honest benefit? Must it always be seen to reflect some kind of ego-gratification on the part of the sponsor? Do you think there are better ways of charitable giving? (Assume here that all the money goes directly to the child. For the organization that I’m involved with, it does).
Related Posts - How Will You Spend the Money From Your Parents' Estates When They're Gone?
- Fière d'être Canadienne/ Proud to Be Canadian - Best Canadian Personal Finance Blogs Edition
- Everything Wants Your Attention, But Where You Direct It Is One Of The Few Things You Can Control
- Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller - Jeff Rubin (Review)
- Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They are Making (by David Rothkopf, Viking Canada, 2008)
Related Articles From Other Websites
-
{ 3 comments }
I’m opposed to it, not from any concerns about colonial attitude, just from an effectiveness perspective. “The Road to Hell: The Ravaging Effects of Foreign Aid and International Charity” by Michael Maren should be required reading by anyone who wants to be involved in organizations like this (including as donors).
The biggest problem with non-profits in general is that they’re typically ineffective. Staff seem to think that there good intentions are all that matter, not actually any goods or services.
I love business for exactly that reason, both parties are getting something out of it, so they’re both motivated to continue the relationship (and to continue being effective so the other party doesn’t terminate it).
Thanks for the book tip, I’ll check it out…
I agree that both sides need to be motivated and that there should be some “real return” in the form of something that the beneficiaries actually receive, i.e., in the way of a better education, or drinking water, or whatever the organization focuses on.
Since it is charitable giving, though, the only thing I’m looking for in return is just to know that my “child” (Angel) is actually benefitting from money I give – otherwise there’s no point in my giving it.
But I would like to learn more about others’ experiences if you’ve been involved with charities in Africa or something similar. I would like to visit Angel some day and so far, the organization is really decent. Like I said, it comes with “no strings attached” and they’re just trying to build schools over there. So they’re very focused.
Originally I had checked out World Vision (because they’re the most visible, probably), but ultimately I disagree with the fact that their charitable activities come with the underhanded clause that 1) they filter communication to the children and 2) they will only accept donors and beneficiaries who agree to receiving a specifically Christian education.
Anyways, enough said.
Another great book, that really got me inspired about this again is Jeffrey Sach’s _The End of Poverty_ or something like that.
If you had ever gone to the developing countries in Africa or in South America, you would know how great Angelina Jolie is. She is devoting her life in the charity to improve the situation of children and women in the third world countries. I think the bad situation could not be understood by the ones who had never ever been there.
This summer I had the chance to travel to Africa. I did not go to the spots of interests but go to the poorest areas of that continent, because when I was home I could not imagine how bad situation they were in. Then what I saw shocked me. If I could, I would like to call it the hell. The children were lack of food and medicine. Their lives were threatened by the starvation and AIDS. Some of them were born as HIV sufferers and all they could do is waiting for the death just because they do not have money to last their lives. It is a kind of competition, the starvation and the AIDS are the competitors, they are competing for who take away the children’s lives first. And I met some health children there. All they do every day is trying their best to see the sun rising for the next day.
During the trip, I cried several times in my tent. At first I was crying for there has no toilet at all. Then as I got with the children and women there, I just cried for their situation. There are so many single mothers and children who would never know who are their fathers. They are living under the threatening of death, but when you are with them you could be moved by their positive attitude. Sometimes I thought that I might suicide if I were in that situation. These children and women need more and more people to take part in the charity activity for rescuing them.
Comments on this entry are closed.