Are you liking the new frugality trend? Get used to it. Frugality is “in” and here to stay – but not because the U.S. housing and credit markets collapsed and 30% of everyone’s savings have disappeared. According to Jeff Rubin, ex-senior economist at CIBC World Markets, the growing scarcity in the world’s fossil fuels supply is going to mandate that we begin to live our lives more locally, more frugally and more sustainably. We simply won’t have a choice.
This past weekend I read Jeff Rubin’s new, much-touted hardcover, just released in late May 2009 – Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller. I first heard about it while watching an interview with Rubin on BNN’s SqueezePlay sometime in late 2008, I believe. Rubin is well-known as an energy expert, and is frequently consulted for his notoriously “bearish” rants on the case for the future of the world’s oil supply.
Although Rubin’s immediate argument is nothing that we haven’t heard before in some form or another, Rubin knows world energy like a wine connoisseur loves his wines, or the way a good tracker can spot the difference between 500 types of tracks. Oil is his baby. He’s not just writing this as part of one piece of journalism after another. Simply put, Rubin has gathered up everything he knows about world energy – mostly in the form of oil, since that’s the dominant driver of the world economy – and packaged it in a compelling read that has the pacing of a good suspense thriller. You’ll be amazed at how much smarter you feel just by page 40.
Peak Oil and the End of Globalization
According to Rubin, the world is about to get a whole lot “smaller” in the sense that the goods and services we have available to us will become increasingly localized. The more expensive oil gets — and it will get more and more expensive as we continue to deplete it — the more expensive travel becomes, but also commuting to work and importing fresh fruits and vegetables from other areas. Long gone will be the days when frozen Atlantic salmon will sit in supermarket icers in California. There will be less drivers on the road, too – those who can’t afford to keep up with the rising costs of gasoline will have to take public transit to work – that is, if there is any in their region (I now understand that GM, Ford, and Chrysler are the reasons why the U.S. hasn’t been able to learn any lessons from Europe on public transit).
“With supply dwindling and demand rising, you can expect scarcity. And scarcity means high prices. You can expect triple-digit oil prices in the near future… In the U.S., that should translate into as much as $7-per-gallon gasoline, and about $2 per litre in Canada. Europe is of course already paying those prices, so they should get ready for the equivalent of double-digit gas prices.”
Rubin gives an amazing analysis of oil supply and how oil pricing works, and more importantly, how it affects everything from gas prices in North America to the availability of water and food in Saudi Arabia. He also argues that most proposed “biofuel” alternatives to decreasing oil are not going to work and should be abandoned in favor of more effective uses of taxpayer dollars. Why? Because they cost almost as much energy to make as they provide for fuel. It takes fuel to turn food into fuel, so we’re right back where we started.
Some of the random things you’ll learn in Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller:
- GM’s been selling electric cars in Europe for a while under the Opel Astra model
- the reason there are next to no more street cars, trolleys, etc. in the U.S. is that the carmakers lobbied for their removal
- Saudi Arabia is running out of freshwater, so uses oil to turn seawater into drinkable water
- ethanol production already gobbles up about one-third of America’s total corn crop
- ethanol production depends on the availability and price of natural gas
- “efficient energy” technologies haven’t kept us from wasting energy, but have encouraged us to use more of it for the same price
- even if we all had electric cars, we might not have enough electricity to power them all
A More Frugal, Local, Sustainable Future
Despite the peak oil pronouncements, this is not a pessimistic book. Rubin is quite optimistic, actually, that the forced frugality that will result from the end of cheap oil can only mean good things for life going forward.
“Expensive oil may mean the end of life as we know it, but maybe that life wasn’t particularly great to start with. Smog-congested cities, global warming, oil slicks and other forms of environmental degradation are all part of the legacy of cheap oil.”
Non-judgmental. It’s important to point out, too, that Rubin is not making any value judgments about global vs. local trade. He’s not arguing that globalization is wrong. And he’s certainly not arguing that capitalism and outsourcing are flawed. He’s not even advocating local trade – just merely laying out the global consequences of a depleting oil supply.
Voluntary Frugality. If there’s any implicit argument behind declining oil reserves and the inadequacy of any possible alternatives for replacing it on a mass commercial scale, it’s that we might as well start living below our means now. All of us, including our nations and their economies as a whole. Growth does not have to be numeric, expansive, bigger, better – growth can take the form of added value, time and freedom.
Self-sufficiency. Another argument this book raises – although Rubin doesn’t say it himself – is that it’s also probably a good time for us to become more self-sufficient. If you know how to darn your old socks, you won’t care that you can’t buy any from Indonesia anymore. And so on.
Here are some random benefits that Rubin argues we’ll see – and have already started to see – as a result of triple-digit oil prices:
- more jobs coming back to domestic markets, since transoceanic shipping costs cancel out any competitive wage gains on foreign soil
- this process will gradually melt away U.S. trade deficits with China, for example
- with less oil consumption, global carbons emissions rates will also naturally slow down
Although I am not *quite* at the end of this book, I think it’s safe to say this is the best account of the world’s energy situation that I’ve ever read. One small downside is that at points Rubin feels a bit repetitive in the way he keeps emphasizing the coming “shrinking” of the world in the first half of the book without expanding much on it yet – but that’s the book’s selling point, after all. And it’s not empty rhetoric, so I don’t mind.
Who Should Buy Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller?
If you’ve ever been confused upon hearing the terms “OPEC” and “light sweet crude” in the news, or if the thought of how much a barrel of oil is trading for makes your eyes glaze over while you then turn around and wonder why gas prices fluctuate so incomprehensibly at points – you should take a look at this book. If you do any form of basic social science research – in anthropology, or history — you should take a look at this book. Even if you can name the top 10 largest producing oil fields by area in the world, well, you might not need this book, but I think it’s possible you’d still learn something new from Rubin’s particular perspective. If you studied economics at university, or geology or other earth sciences, it’s possible you know some of what this book has to offer, but Rubin goes beyond mere facts about oil – and looks at its intersection with local politics, food and water needs, as well as historical questions about the development of alternative energy sources. One downside is that it’s still apparently only available in hardcover (and in Kindle). I would have preferred to get a cheaper paperback version, but I got impatient.
What makes the book unique, in my opinion, is the lack of “extremist” tone or the lack of any sense that Rubin has any particular agenda in writing this. Not that I think that’s inherently bad. But I know it annoys some people. It’s just very clear that world energy is a topic Rubin’s very intellectually passionate about, and he wants to share his conclusions with as many people as possible. Sure, he has an opinion beneath it all. But the book does not have a “doomsday” tone to it. He’s convinced about the end of oil, but equally convinced that that means we’re going to see better (cleaner, brighter, fresher) days ahead. How’s that for a change? The book is thus “motivational” in an indirect sort of sense. It might prompt you to pay more attention to this basic layer of the economy. It has definitely opened my eyes further to the fragility of the world’s bustling economy — and we all know how much that can impact our personal finances and prospects for individual wealth and retirement.
I think the book has so much to offer, in fact, that it’s inspired me to do a whole series of related posts (below) this week which will look more closely at topics raised by Rubin’s book: facts about the depletion of the world’s oil supply, the subsidization of oil by OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, where the U.S. gets it oil, and more.
Recommended Reading on the Global Oil Supply
10 Fast Facts About The World’s Declining Oil Supply
Where the U.S. Gets Its Oil (can you guess the top 5 countries oil is imported from?)
The OPEC Oil Consumption Cycle and the Dangers of Cheap Energy
Turning Oil Into Water: The Middle Eastern Resource Accident Waiting to Happen?
If Rubin is right, then the more we know about our energy needs going ahead, the better we’ll be. The price of oil isn’t just about geopolitics — it has a direct impact on how frugal we have to live, where we will buy our food, what food we will (and can) buy, the options we have for traveling, and more. Just about every facet of our lives is influenced by our energy needs. If the food economy is the basis for all other economies, as I argued in another post, then I’d say the energy economy comes in second place. As Rubin masterfully demonstrated here, we invest a lot more energy into growing, freezing, packing and shipping our food around the world than the amount of energy we even get out of it.
If you liked this post, why not subscribe to my blog for free updates and get these delivered right to your reader or by email? Also, feel free to connect with me on Twitter.
Related Posts - Finally Feeling the Recession?
- 10 Fast Facts About the Declining World Oil Supply
- In Case You Missed It: G8 on the Global Economy and Other Good Tidbits
- Where the U.S. Gets Its Oil
- Infrastructure Investing: Your Choices For North American Rail Transport and Railroad Stocks
Related Articles From Other Websites
-




{ 17 trackbacks }
{ 8 comments }
I am quite a believer in the peak oil theory and one of my first exposure to the dire prognosis of the future came in the form of the documentary “The End of Suburbia”. If you liked this book and agree with the sentiment, you should checkout the documentary. It is available on Netflix.
The problem, to my mind, has always been the American propensity to dismiss the Nuclear Option without much deliberation.
It’s terrifying how we’ve built an entire infrastructure around what might end up being a blip on the historical chart of energy and transportation. How much wealth was wasted under an idea of essentially indefinite internal combustion engines? Additionally there are untold effects on our health and well-being.
@Arohan – thanks, I think I’d heard of that doc, but haven’t seen it. Jeff Rubin does cover the nuclear energy option in here, too – the problem is mainly environmental: it causes alot of toxic waste that no one has figured out how to cleanly dispose of yet. But yes, it’s hard to see how anyone can argue there’s really still a ton of oil left – it’s not disappearing overnight, that’s for sure, but I think that in another 10 years our energy needs are going to be very painful.
@Secure – the sad thing is that gasoline is such an effective form of energy, but it’s taken us too long to realize this, and we’ve already wasted so much of it.
Over the past couple of millions of years we have gone from a creature of independence (grew arms, legs, and a thinking skull cap) to one of total dependence of laziness really.
We have now claimed that vehicles are a necessity.
We are bailing out big empires in the trillions.
We have become so so dependent upon our infrastructures it is no longer funny.
Maybe it is time the pendullium swings back.
The easy going lifestyles that we have so admired may have to change.
As mother nature and this thing called the economy is so far removed from one another.
Nor is it sustainable.
Time will tell.
Everything is dependent on cheap energy. From inflation (the good you buy), to the vehicle you drive (at 3000lbs at 25% efficiency), to the interest rates etc…
But, Saudi Arabia has been pumping fresh water into the wells to keep the economy booming… at the expense of fresh water for their people of course… shhhh…
We are next for “cheap” oil. Tell me that boiling oil out of sand isn’t desperate!!! shhh…. don’t tell anyone, but they boil the oil out with natural gas. Yes, the stuff we heat our homes with!!! Expect that to be subsidized soon enough and we covering the costs!
We just dumped in billions and trillions into the economy. Now, 2% of the world owns most of the world’s wealth. I wonder who got to the swimming pool first to bail out all that water that the government just dumped into the pool all at once!!! The wealthy have the connections, the tools and the know how. While the rest of us are stuck with the bill.
White collar crime isn’t really seen as a big crime.
Which brings about some questions I have:
1) how much of that bail out money is due to espionage (spies), how much is due to scandals (white collar crime, they never get caught), and how much is due to just pure inefficiency of the economies (tell me how many jobs actually add value and return on investment? and how much more efficient are we becoming as a whole? I see a lot of investment into roads and buildings… what return on investment does that really have? Probably none… But, you can bet that someone some place is making money off this entire cycle – 90s brought high tech boom and bust, 00 brought huge government spending and housing boom (and big ticket items)… mostly hiring 20 somethings. I know lots of 40 somethings just suffering right now. Those with families).
2) can the world handle all 6 billion of us. Especially if we are all after prosperity. We sell the Americas as the land of prosperity. Can we keep going using so much energy in a wasteful way without much concern for the future. Government accounting is typically just year by year without much long term planning… Can we keep using energy as we have been? Do we really need a push for R&D and efficiency. Small is good. Diversity in corporations. What we have now is monopolies and at the mercy of them as we have just seen (bailout)
@mac – you ask some good questions. I like the comparison you’ve drawn between Canada’s oil giants using natural gas to process the oil sands vis a vis Saudi Arabia using oil to produce the fresh water it needs. It’s no secret, Canadian oil sands companies have had more profitability during the past season due to extremely cheap natural gas prices.
This sounds like a good read from a very rational author. I think you did a great job reviewing it as well and highlighting the fact that increased oil prices may not be such a horrible thing.
I started learning about peak oil a few years back and stumbled on a case study about how cuba had to live without oil after the embargos and ironically many people they interviewed in the story said their lives were better with less oil since it required them to build a greater sense of community in order to survive, which in turn, made the people happier.
@Ryan – that’s pretty interesting. But not surprising!
Comments on this entry are closed.